Monthly Archives: December 2010

One Year To Go Til Oscar’s Olympics!

July 27th 2011 – one year until the opening ceremony for the 2012 London Olympics, and as good a time as any to write about one runner in particular…

On 19th July 2011, he ran 45.07 for the 400 metres at a meeting in Italy. That qualified him to run in the 2012 Olympics. Ok, good for him, but many many others have qualified, and many other will qualify. So, what makes him stand out? Well, his name’s Oscar Pistorius, and he doesn’t have legs.

His legs were amputated between the knee and ankle when he was 11 months old, so he’s never really known life to be any different. A such he has never considered himself disabled, he just considered himself as him.

A keen and promising sprinter, in 2007 he began competing in races against able bodied athletes, using special blades. In a sport which has a record of political intrigue, it took no time for the governing body, the IAAF, to take notice. In the same year they changed their rules to disallow any athlete using a device which gave an advantage to other athletes not using the device.

They said it was unrelated to Pistorius, but not many people believed that. Pistorius challenged the ruling, and it went all the way to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, who overturned the decision. He was now allowed to compete in the 2008 Olympics, but fell just short of the qualifying time.

Pistorius’ story was now well in the public domain, and he campaigns for disabled people to be viewed and treated the same as able bodied. He is happy to be known as ‘Blade Runner’ and ‘the fastest man on no legs’.

He constantly advocates ‘life without limitations’ and says we should not be judged or held back by disability, rather we should be judged by and use our abilities instead.

Impressive? I think so.

The 400 metres is often called the ‘man killer’ of athletics, because it’s a vicious combination of the shorter sprints and the longer middle distance races. The lungs need to have a certain capacity for anyone to be able to do it at the highest level.

Any 400 metre runner has to put in years and years of work and training. Pistorius has had to put in the same amount of work and training, but has also had to battle against prejudice and politics.

Good for him I say. Will he win in London? Well his fastest time says that he won’t no, but surely for him the victory comes in simply qualifying in the first place

As an athlete he would surely wince at that comment, because he wants to win, but in this article I’m drawing the achievement lessons from the journey rather than one specific result.

Posted in Olympics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Badminton – A Sport For Counts, Cagney And The Whole Family

Badminton, that game played with small racquets and a funny looking thing called a shuttlecock (or bird), actually has a long and storied history. The sport first appeared in China around 500 BC. It was called Ti Jian Zi and was played with a shuttlecock and one’s feet.

The sport next surfaced in the 16th century where it was played by the European nobility (hence the sport of Counts) and was known as “jeu de Volant,” which was French for “wheel game.” It consisted of hitting a small ball with the palm of one’s hand.

Call it badminton or call it Poona
The sport as we recognize it today was created by British military officers in India in the mid-18th century. It was particularly popular in the British garrison town of Poona so was known as Poona for a period of time.

Retired British Army officers took the game to England where its rules were developed. It was officially launched in 1873 at the Badminton House, Gloucestershire — hence the name badminton.

Badminton in America
America’s first club was the Badminton Club of New York, which was founded in 1878. Badminton’s popularity took off in the 1930s as YMCAs, schools and hundreds of new badminton clubs offered lessons in the sport. Its popularity was also spurred in the 1930s due to the avid play of such Hollywood stars as James Cagney (the sport of Cagney), Douglas Fairbanks, Boris Karloff, Dick Powell, Ginger Rogers and Bette Davis.

How badminton compares with other sports
One of the more interesting things about this game is that it is played with a shuttlecock, a projectile with feathers, which causes it to fly differently from the balls used in other sports. The feathers of a shuttlecock create a much higher drag, so that it decelerates much faster than a ball.

While there have never been definitive studies done comparing badminton with other sports, there is a general agreement that it – especially the singles version – requires more aerobic stamina than tennis while tennis requires greater upper body and core strength.

It is also generally agreed that the sport definitely requires more explosive athleticism than tennis and a somewhat greater explosive athleticism than squash. It also requires significantly faster reaction times than either squash or tennis.

Family fun or cutthroat competition
Another thing that makes this sport unique is that it can be played for fun or as serious competition. If you ever see Olympic badminton, you will know what we mean – it’s incredibly fast paced and requires an amazing athleticism. Yet, you can also spend as little as $19.95, put up a court in your backyard and watch your kids spend hours battling each other for family bragging rights. And that’s certainly something you can’t say about football, basketball or even tennis.

Posted in Badminton | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

History of Diecast Car Models

Building a spectacular compilation or using the collectables as toys was not the initial purpose for die-cast car models. Models were made for marketing purposes. To plan for new cars, manufacturers would make scale and full-sized replicas of the real vehicles. Clay or wood was used for some of these models. In others, the material that the real vehicles were made from, was sometimes the same as that which the replicas were made from. Another purpose for the die-cast cars was to add realism to train sets.

During the first 30 years of the 20th Century, car models were made from basic slush cast plaster and iron. The 20 years following, cars, trucks, and military replicas were formed from tin and pressed steel, better quality materials. After World War II models made in different kinds of alloys became prevalent.

Europe became the place where these alloys established an enormous presence. In the United States, there was a demand for plastic cars, but not so much for the die-cast metal cars, as they were rudimentary in form. Japan became privy to the tin and pressed steel models by the 1950s. The nation continued its production during the 1960s. When the 1970s creeped around, Japan was producing die-cast cars. The chief producers of die-cast metal cars presently, include China and countries from southeast Asia.

The size of the models depended on the particular niche companies were attracting. Because railroad layouts already established a basic universal scale, before World War II, car and truck models from Europe had to conform to that size in order to be included in the display. Additionally, in order to appeal to children some companies concentrated on small scaled replicas.

Precision was the name of the game for European model vehicles, featuring the complexities of doors, trunks, and hoods opening up. This occurred because in Europe the labor market increased after the war. Consequently, there was a greater pool of laborers available to manufacturer the vehicles. In contrast, in America, the labor force was not as large, therefore, the replicas were made from simple cast iron or plastic, and consisted of very few parts.

In Europe, the doors, trunks, axles, wheels, and hoods were all separate parts in the manufacturing process. In the United States, all of these items would be included in one large, unimpressive piece. However, after some time, American automotive dealerships were in need of promoting their new arrivals, so the models became more sophisticated. This complexity was aided by technological advances. Additionally, adults have become more interested in collecting the models since the 1980s, therefore manufacturers have been producing less toy-like renditions. Today because of the high cost of production, moving parts are becoming less prevalent.

Licensing arrangements have been made between the real car manufacturers and the manufacturers of the die-cast models. There was a time back in the 1950s and 1960s such agreements were not necessary because the real car manufacturers welcomed the popularity of the models because they provided free advertising. This is not the case anymore, as the real car manufacturers seek legal ways to protect the originality of their vehicles.

Posted in Auto Racing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Strength and Spine of Carbon Arrows

The shaft and spine of carbon arrows are a very important addition to successful bowhunting. The “shaft” of the arrow is also known as the GPI or “grains per inch” on the bow. If you look in small letters, you’ll see something like “7.3 GPI” or “9.5 GPI” or something greater or less. That is the grains per inch of the arrow you’re using and has significant affects on the performance and results of your bow.

The smaller the shaft, the faster the bow will be; however, it will also mean the bow will produce less kinetic energy and the result is less penetration. If you take a small gravel and throw it against a fence, it will be quick. Sometimes, even so quick you won’t see the gravel moving, but you will only hear a “peck” noise. If you would grab a much bigger rock, it might travel a little slower, but you will hear a much heavier “bang.” That is because the heavier the rock, the more kinetic energy produced. Don’t get caught up in too much speed. Kinetic energy is very important.

Kinetic energy is probably the most under-looked factor by archers to this day. Everyone is so caught up in how fast the chronograph measures their bow, that they lose the idea on how much penetration and kinetic energy the arrow is producing. In boxing, kinetic energy leads to knock outs, while speed leads to points.

Kinetic energy is measured in pounds per foot. And the formula to finding the kinetic energy your bow is generating is [speed * speed * arrow weight divided by 450240]. That’s to say that speed is important for your total kinetic energy produced, but the arrow weight is also important. You want to produce fast speeds with a heavier grain arrow. Most people that are not seeing a lot of kinetic energy is due to lack of arrow weight; rather than lack of speed.

People often mistake the “spine” of the arrow to be the grain. The “spine” is the big number on the arrow often written “500″ or “340″ or “400″ or somewhat. The heavier your draw weight, the lower the “spine” number should be. The spine number is nothing more than the total bend-stiffness ratio. The technique used to determine the “spine” of an arrow is to take a 29 inch arrow, hold it at 28 inches on each end and hold a 1.94 pound weight in the middle of it, the amount of bend determines the stiffness. A heavier draw weight arrow would have a harder landing and more impact, and the result is the need for less bend in the arrow, so that the arrow doesn’t break or bend upon impact.

Posted in Archery | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment